EDIT: Like I have mentioned, there are always subtle differences between anatomy standards and not all people are conform to these standards either. I won't say these drawings are 100% correct but I also won't say these are ridiculously out of this world. Therefore, I welcome any feedbacks or standards which I could have never heard of. Do share.
Got myself a new anatomy book this Friday. Super inspired again. XD
Drawing the front is alright but I need to understand more on the back anatomy. There's always this subtle differences between the sources references online and books and I don't really know which is more accurate.
In case it's hard to tell, the skulls are there as visual indicators. Drew those in to add value to this otherwise boring drawing. The base of the chest should be a head long from the base of the chin. Distance between the base of the chest to the naval should be another one head long.
It will make sense if the legs were included. I like drawing things big to allow more details. Each of these were drawn on A4 paper which had already took up the whole paper space. That leaves the legs for another day. Haha~
ha??????????? where is all this coming from? and I can assure you this is exactly how the average male body would look like. The fact you dont see it's because of the fat covering the muscles + more fat + skin. I did dissection in first and second year of med school and this is what they do look like. st.depositphotos.com/2036511/1… . Knock yourself out
COME ON!~!!! your comments make me sad... stop it..
first of all they arent pictures, they are draws, which implies fantasy, idealization and perfection. If anyone would believe that is an actual standard to beauty it needs to get a reality check. Plus he even says it's not accurate.. take a chill pill. he is studying muscles.. geez leave the poor guy alone!