EDIT: Like I have mentioned, there are always subtle differences between anatomy standards and not all people are conform to these standards either. I won't say these drawings are 100% correct but I also won't say these are ridiculously out of this world. Therefore, I welcome any feedbacks or standards which I could have never heard of. Do share.
Got myself a new anatomy book this Friday. Super inspired again. XD
Drawing the front is alright but I need to understand more on the back anatomy. There's always this subtle differences between the sources references online and books and I don't really know which is more accurate.
In case it's hard to tell, the skulls are there as visual indicators. Drew those in to add value to this otherwise boring drawing. The base of the chest should be a head long from the base of the chin. Distance between the base of the chest to the naval should be another one head long.
It will make sense if the legs were included. I like drawing things big to allow more details. Each of these were drawn on A4 paper which had already took up the whole paper space. That leaves the legs for another day. Haha~
ha??????????? where is all this coming from? and I can assure you this is exactly how the average male body would look like. The fact you dont see it's because of the fat covering the muscles + more fat + skin. I did dissection in first and second year of med school and this is what they do look like. st.depositphotos.com/2036511/1… . Knock yourself out
COME ON!~!!! your comments make me sad... stop it..
first of all they arent pictures, they are draws, which implies fantasy, idealization and perfection. If anyone would believe that is an actual standard to beauty it needs to get a reality check. Plus he even says it's not accurate.. take a chill pill. he is studying muscles.. geez leave the poor guy alone!
This is the best muscle study i have found, anywhere, and i've searched a lot. I hate to ask or commission this, but I don't think I could express how grateful I would be if you did either more female studies or a female study in this style. Either way I love your work and am really grateful for the reference.
Arc does know how to draw and like i said she was not taking credit for the actual drawing. there are quite a few artists who use anothers work to help create tgere own work. If not there wouldnt be any new art because everything is basef of anothers work
This cannot be referred to as "based off". She bluntly took the art of someone else and smeared her stuff onto it.
And as I said; if she wants to do it so badly then she has to LEARN IT. What do you think the world would look like if every artist would just say "ahhh, I wanna do this but I cannot draw, eh, might as well just take the work of someone else"
Thats not what i meant. she needed a reference and arc is a cool person if the artist of the pic wants her to take it down she will. she only wanted people to see her idea before she had finnished her own pic.
Ok I must say since being in a Figure Drawing class at my college into the 3rd lvl of it. I really like how you drew the torso. Granted its done really nicely for it not being "completely accurate" I mean you are right everyone varies, every anatomy is different per individual and its not really super abstracted either, really believable. I do have one question, the back view, are the shoulders pulled back giving that appearance or are they relaxed? Its making me feel as if the spin is stiff there due to the "depth" given between the right and left side. All in all though, really nice.